Sublime Intervention:
Co-creating
our Missing Link

by Randy A. Koppang
illustration by Kesara

In the public domain of data regarding CE-4 experience, the hard evidence being retrieved by Derrel Sims and Dr. Roger Leir, M.D. is unprecedented.

With scientifically replicable protocols for locating bodypoints of CE-4 cases, where alleged implants may be, procedures are applied: X-ray confirmation, surgical removal and lab analysis of objects removed from five cases to date. (see FIRST)

The aforementioned facts vindicate the credibility of CE-4case histories volunteered for study, thereby setting a foundation upon which to hypothesize an understanding of the differing set ofCE-4 claims addressed here.

Mounting data is occurring in all areas of Ufology. We defer wisely to the recognition that throughout our century, popular media anticipated this theme: Contact with life from other worlds. And mounting evidence to the contrary is not forthcoming.

Thus, if recently reported "Martian Chronicles" by NASA seem to be too little (micro-organismic) too late -- the question persists: What would an alien's-eye-view of Earth symbolize to E.T.I.? Would Earth simply be a swirling gene-swarm; a resource to use in ways we cannot prepare to appreciate?

The premise for this discussion, therefore, is in the following correlation. A substantial percentage (by no means, all) of "abductees" feel they are party to a grand blueprint for historical change: An alien agenda of pro-creationism -- the genetic tailoring of us! Albeit that the CE-4/"hybridization" data is not news, I refer to our central existential debate still shaping society today - and I correlate the above claims and implications to the educational challenge of Creationism vs. Evolutionism.

Anthropologists have yet to locate remains of the "missing link" whereby brain size in modern humans evolved from our predecessor hominids. On an evolutionary time scale, this occurred in no time at all. Could it be this "link" is not preserved, nor manifest, as anthropologists conceptualize it; will never be unearthed or recognized as such, because the link giving birth to humankind's great leap in intelligence was created -- purposely introduced genetic traits via engineering by E.T.I.?

Some of our abductees report having reproductive cell samples taken from them, by beings clearly not human, for creation of hybrid young, part alien and part human. (Of these, a few claim to incur an unexplainable/"virgin" pregnancy, going full term to birth). BUT, given our human understanding of genetics, the children of what may be inter-species breeding(however achieved) should not be viable and may not even be possible. Based upon common beliefs, this genetic discrepancy lends incredibility to the whole abduction scenario.

More fundamentally, skeptics feel that a program whereby aliens continually (seem to) collect human genetic material makes no scientific sense; presuming alien expertise in genetics should bypass such seemingly "primitive" methods(?).

In this regard, I quote researcher Linda Moulton Howe, with comments from a member of her lecturing audience:

L.M. Howe: "And what may be going on with abductees?...[Raising] the hard problem that if we were dealing with something that can harvest genetic material, create hybrids, humanoids, androids -- why would they have to keep coming back, harvesting genetic material week after week, month after month, year after year, decade after decade... that's the part I don't think is clear. And..."

Member of Audience: "When you say 'clear', that means they should have had a sufficient amount of this at the beginning, in [a] short interim period. You're saying it's not necessary to keep returning."

L.M. Howe: "I don't even understand why they would even have to collect it. You would think they'd be able to manufacture it. So, I personally am not convinced that we really understand -- what's going on? And I'm just giving you what the current, most current conversation is... We haven't even touched the issue of the 'Soul Matrix' that keeps coming up in the abduction syndrome." (1)

Indeed, if the "abduction syndrome" is being accurately reported, humans will have to raise their collective consciousness generally. The main point here is becoming comprehensively informed. So, I will speculate, with revised genetics information, in an effort to explain(not prove) repeated sperm/ova collection from abductees.

However, prior to proceeding further, I shall first address the extent to which this may be occurring to abductees. Quoting from the books and lectures of psychologist Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D. (2) and Karla Turner, Ph.D. (3) (Turner is an abductee investigator; she and her husband are abductees), both researchers emphasize that substantial care be taken in reporting the marked varieties of abduction experience, so as to avoid undue emphasis on a single variable (e.g., media hype equating abudctees, generally, with human breeders [in-vivo/in-vitro] is apparently disproportionate). On 9/13/94, precisely this very type of presentation occurred on "The Maury Povich Show",featuring a woman who was allegedly forced into sex with an alien.

In broadly surveying the abduction clientele of professional colleagues, and their own, Turner and Boylan both conclude that only about 50% of abductees (mostly women) claim participation in analien/human genetic engineering scheme. (4)

The bottom line here is: If aliens wanted to covertly procreate with humans, does it make good "genetic sense", scientifically, that their reported repetitive methods would be necessary? These are:

1. Sperm collection
2. Ova collection
3. In-vitro insemination
4. Embryo-cell implantation
5. Fetal retrieval
6. Fetal nurseries where alien/human hybrids of primarily alien genetic proportions seem to be nurtured to maturity

Well, presently, humans are doing their best perfecting the first four procedures. (Ironically, a controversy is now brewing regarding human ethics using these very four procedures to aid infertile women. The issue was debated at length on the 10/2/94 broadcast of "60 Minutes" and the 9/27/94 local evening news "Crosstalk" feature on KCAL-TV Los Angeles.) So far, so good! And yet, complicating our understanding is abduction evidence suggesting that their experience involves the "mating" of dissimilar species or classes of biological organisms.

Therefore, what do we actually know about combining DNA so as to better grasp the likelihood of this alleged intervention scheme(divine or otherwise)?

DNA is information -- a double helix chain of paired chemicals. The technological analogy to DNA had been the engineer's blueprint. A more current version is that DNA is like an encoded computer program software. But contrary to learned opinions of media, lay people and scientists alike, organisms are not now seen to be the "spatial realization" of such big-software-like programs (5); i.e., DNA codes. Clarified appreciation of forces affecting embryo development now assigns much greater importance to post-conception influences via non-genetic pathways: The context of the reproductive process is now being seen to mean everything! And "meaning is a matter of context, not [genetic] content." (6)

The following are non-genetic inputs of development (7):

1. DNA quantity -- e.g., the amount of DNA information in mammals is less than that necessary for an amphibian; and yet, mammals are more highly evolved. Amphibians require more DNA because the context of their egg development is, by definition, subject to temperature variables. Unlike mammals, they need more DNA to accommodate weather changes.

2. "Evolutionary convergence" -- different causes can produce the same effect; e.g., wings have emerged among the insects, the birds, the mammals, and among the dinosaurs (pterosaurs).

3. How reproductive information is conveyed and received: DNA compares with a computer software of instructions on how to construct the parents. And the medium of the embryonic genesis is the "hardware" in which DNA-software produces the process. If the context of development (e.g., the human body) is not a finely-tuned (optimally healthy) biochemical machine, defects in the birth may occur. It's like playing a state-of-the-art recording on a cheap, low-fidelity player. You'll never hear subtle nuances of sound reproduction potentially provided in the recording without a system capable of realizing it for you.

4. Likewise with the meaning of DNA information: Progeny is a sum total of stages in genesis. "Each stage depends upon the quality of the others. And these stages of maturation are terrestrially unique; i.e., the physics, chemistry, biology and cultural heritage of being, 'for which no information as such need be received."' E.g., the fluid dynamics of amniotic fluids and cellular fluids are subject to the geo-physical energies within our planetary/atmospheric envelope. As nature conserves energy in her ecology, she would not waste it by programming shapes of organisms into DNA if the laws of physics will create it for her free of charge.

Believe me, the genetic information here is immensely simplified. And the genetic vs. non-genetic forces of heredity are far from being clearly understood (8). However, new insights into the process conclude that DNA does not describe biological form. It prescribes the form, only within the context of that particular form (9). And one of the greatest mysteries within the mystery of formative human evolution is that of consciousness vs. physiological form. This point serves well to reintroduce the possibility that E.T. intelligences are attempting to combine our form with theirs.

If the above non-genetic affectations must be respected in an E.T. hybridization plan, which human hereditary traits do they want or need? Could they need offspring with greater adaptability for our biosphere; or do they strive for theafore mentioned subtleties of non-genetic human qualities only accessible through gestation on Earth? Whatever the priority, abductions are reported to follow patterns of family-specific gene lines.

Testimony seems to consistently suggest that of the many E.T. races contacting them, the "grey"-type beings are especially interested in the degree of emotions prominent among humans, plus our sexuality.

Whether these two attributes are what E.T.I. wants "in their mixed-heritage offspring is unclear". Precisely what maybe wanted "is the subject of intense debate among...researchers", according to Dr. Richard J. Boylan (10).

Also, consistently reported by abductees contacting small "grey" E.T.s, is that these beings have no visible signs of gender or genitalia. So let's speculate on the existence of these beings; that they themselves are products of bioengineering; that they are genetic composites of three distinct biological classes. Let's say their heritage is 5% mammalia, 80% insecta and 15% reptilia...

With the above genetic proportions, an intelligent bipedal being was possibly realized. It had some physical traits of reptiles, plus telepathic capabilities of a group/"hive"-minded, non-individuated sense of group-dependent identity...

Then, suppose they wanted to enhance the "human" traits of themselves. Maybe the traits they wanted were those, a complete understanding of which were not even recognized, but by a few in the host (in this case, us). What might they be, these traits?

(E.g.) Re: this last question, I offer some food for thought and grounds for further research. There is a previously unrecognized and integral energy force in human emotional and physiological function. Only now is this energy being experimentally verified by current scientific research. But the first empirical and scientific study of this non-genetic feature of living organisms was by Wilhelm Reich, M.D. between 1930 and 1947. Dr. Reich concluded that the basis of human emotions and sexuality exists in a pulsatory energetic, which underlies the linkage between psychic and bodily processes. One of the anatomical keys to this linkage is the autonomic nervous system.

Reich proved experimentally that our human psychic/emotional traits are expressed as a mirror of our health through the individual character; the sexual/physiological traits likewise are expressed via bodily musculature (i.e., how humans armor or "carry" themselves in muscular posturing). These two interacting systems, Reich stated, were energized via the autonomic nervous system which linked them. And this energy was not bio-electronic in nature(11). (Quoting James DeMeo, Ph.D., an authority on Dr. Reich's work: "Reich was able to demonstrate... there is a bridge between the non-living and the living world... Sydney Fox at the University of Miami has made some replications of experiments, very close to Reich's; there's a whole field, today, known as 'bio-genesis research'. And the closer they get to replicating Reich's work, the more lifelike they are able to create things in the laboratory.(12)")

With Reich's discoveries we, once again, can appreciate that there are qualities of being Earth-born humans, other than those due to heredity. These non-genetic factors may be inherently functions of being Earthbound; maybe meta-heredity, attributed to our Mother Earth. I would add, with the proviso that our planetary genome exists with limits comparable to anew car warranty; if you exceed operation limits and it begins to malfunction, don't expect the warranty on a new Ford to be honored at a Chevy dealer (i.e., the "off-planet" location hybrid children are presumably reared at/in).

Thus, apparently, if E.T.s wish to realize specific traits of humaneness, even in a largely alien-plus-humanhybrid, the offspring must be initially gestated each time in a human female, preferably on Earth, for a minimum length of time. Patterns of experience in abduction testimony bear this out historically. Yet, none of this proves the scenario is true.

Presuming, for the sake of argument, that the allegations are true, there is a more pragmatic explanation possible as to repeated abduction for cross-breeding. This is, of course, that it doesn't work: The E.T.s adhered to the necessary procedural steps in context, but the offspring lived only a few years, or something to that effect. So, they persevere. Who knows?

At the beginning of this article, I proposed: That if the alleged E.T./human commingling could be seen as true, the facts would challenge the Creationism vs. Evolutionism debate. In this regard, I return to consider a variation on this type of abduction. This variation needs clarification in furthering abduction research, and to this end I quote Dr. Richard J. Boylan: "Some women have reported becoming mysteriously pregnant while they were celibate. The resultant 'miracle' babies often turn out to be unusually gifted. Others become pregnant and carry the fetus for up to three months, then suddenly learn from their obstetrician that there is no fetus and they have had a false pregnancy (13)."

What I feel needs clarification is the causal distinction between these two very different experiences.

Dr. Boylan's quote is literal. And combining these two scenarios (albeit understandable) in the same context is "comparing apples and oranges". Up to this point I've focused on applying revised insights into genetic transfer to the latter mystery. The former situation is much more accessible.

If a woman's celibacy is certain, and she becomes inexplicably pregnant, giving birth to an otherwise totally human child, etc. etc... it's fairly safe to say she did not give birth to a hybrid whose genetics are "predominantly" of a totally alien class of organism. No! The father would, in this case, be very human-like, albeit from, perhaps, a different star system.

Of all these possibilities for evolved co-creation, it is something along the lines of this "virgin" birth proposition that seems most plausible/viable, doing much to explain the mysterious leap forward in our collective Intelligence Quotient in virtually no evolutionary time.

Emphasizing the preceding thought, I conclude with honorable mention of an historical revisioning according to Zecharia Sitchin. He is one of the few scholars able to read and understand Sumerian, archaic Hebrew and other Semitic languages. Sitchin has based his recent series of books, The Earth Chronicles, on prehistorical clay tablets written by ancient Near Eastern civilizations.

Through his years of transliterating pre-Biblical and Biblical information, Sitchin "delves into the core of humankind's existence, origin and destiny." (14) His conclusions are that ancient tablet texts and "cylinder seal" illustrations recount a genesis epic with elements of genetic engineering. This epic somewhat parallels accounts where some abductees become mysteriously pregnant, giving "virgin" birth. Sitchin states that Sumerian texts report- where human-like E.T.s come to Earth. And for very pragmatic motives, scientifically; they "used genetic manipulation, and in-vitro fertilization techniques to create 'primitive' Homo sapiens..." about 300,000 years ago!

Sitchin's argument is extremely well documented, albeit surely interpretive. Yet, numerous recent archaeological and anthropological discoveries in the Mid-East have been revelatory in revising conventional wisdom re: our own past -- plus having the irony of substantially supporting important details in Sitchin's case.

However, Sitchin clearly states that his area of expertise and ufology are totally independent.

What Sitchin's work does well is to correlate with ufology. And, collectively, the material presented here attempts to correlate evidence which cannot be denied because it's uncomfortable.

Vitally important is that these possibilities do not leave "God out of the loop", because creation itself is an unfathomable challenge to static perceptions.

Footnotes
1. Linda Moulton Howe: Book promotion lecture, 5/27/94, at Alexandria II Book Store, Pasadena, CA. Ms. Howe is an Emmy Award-winning TV producer, author and authority on the cattle mutilation mystery.

2. Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D., " Close Extraterrestrial Encounters",1994, Wild Flower Press, P.O. Box 230893, Tigard, OR 97281-0983.

3. Karla Turner, Ph.D., "Taken", Kelt Works, P.O. Box 32,Roland, Arkansas 72135. Her first book is "Into the Fringe".

4. The percentages referred to here are systematically and independently corroborated in: "The Entities: Initial Findings ofthe Abduction Transcription Project", published in Mufon UFOJournal, Feb./March 1994; Mufon, 103 Oldtowne Rd., Sequin, TX 78155-4099.

5. "Our Genes Aren't Us", article excerpted from "The Collapse ofChaos" by Jack Cohen and Ian Stewart, Viking-Penguin, 1994; the article was published in Discover Magazine, 4/94.

6. Ibid.

7. Ibid.

8. "The Collapse of Chaos", Cohen & Stewart, Viking-Penguin,1994.

9. Ibid.

10. Richard J. Boylan, Ibid.

11. Wilhelm Reich, M.D., "The Cancer Biopathy". This book was originally published in 1948 and reprinted in 1973; these editions are now out of print.

12. James DeMeo, Ph.D., lecture: 22nd Annual Cancer Control Society Conference, 9/3/94, Pasadena, CA.

13. Richard J. Boylan, Ibid.

14. Zecharia Sitchin, "Genesis Revisited", Bear ~ Company, Inc., Santa Fe, NM 87504-2860.

Copyright 1996 Randy Kopang
Illustration Copyright 1996 Kesara